Classical nucleation theory versus activated chemical reaction kinetics calculator

H. Yan and H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia, Queen Mary University of London

Comparison between temperature-dependent nucleation barriers and constant chemical activation barriers

In homogeneous chemical reactions governed by transition state theory, the free energy barrier to forming the activated complex (ΔG‡) is essentially constant with temperature. Consequently, thermal energy (kBT) progressively assists particles over the barrier, ensuring that the chemical rate coefficient k increases monotonically with temperature. In classical nucleation theory (CNT), the thermodynamic barrier (ΔG*) is strongly temperature-dependent: it diverges to infinity at the equilibrium transformation temperature T0 because the driving force vanishes (ΔGv → 0). At low temperatures, atomic mobility freezes out (exp(-Q/kBT) → 0). This trade-off produces a characteristic non-monotonic C-curve with a maximum nucleation rate at an intermediate undercooling.

Model parameters

Operating temperature (T) 750 K
Equilibrium transition temperature (T0) 1000 K
Interfacial energy term (Bnuc) 4.5 × 10⁷ K³
Diffusion migration barrier (QD) 100.0 kJ/mol
Chemical activation energy (ΔG‡) 60.0 kJ/mol
Undercooling (ΔT = T0 - T) 250.0 K
Nucleation barrier (ΔG*) 5.98 × 10⁻¹⁹ J
Normalized nucleation rate (I/Imax) 0.842
Normalized chemical reaction rate (k/kref) 0.081
Free energy barriers vs temperature
Kinetic rate vs temperature (C-curve vs Arrhenius)

Thermodynamic origin of the fundamental difference

The contrast between classical nucleation and an activated chemical reaction arises from whether the free energy barrier is intrinsic to the molecules or emerges from phase coexistence thermodynamics:

Download free book