Thermodynamics of deep demixing minima and pure component boundary slopes
In a binary regular solution, the molar Gibbs free energy of mixing balances positive enthalpic repulsion (Ω > 0) with negative configurational entropy:
1. Why the two minima are deep and pronounced
When temperature drops below the critical threshold (T < Tc = Ω / (2R)), the curve undergoes a pitchfork bifurcation into a double-well potential.
In the optimum demixing regime (T / Tc ≈ 0.65 – 0.85), the configurational entropy contribution remains substantial enough to drag the two equilibrium minima well below the pure-component baseline (ΔGmix < 0), while the repulsive enthalpy maintains a high crest at x = 0.5.
Any overall mixture composition between xα and xβ lowers its total free energy by splitting into two coexisting solutions linked along the dashed horizontal common tangent tie-line.
2. Why the boundary slopes must diverge to infinity
Regardless of how deep the two minima dip or how tall the central demixing hump becomes, the curve never leaves the pure axes at a positive or zero slope. Differentiating the free energy of mixing gives:
As composition approaches pure solvent A (x → 0+), the enthalpy derivative approaches a strictly finite constant (Ω), whereas the logarithmic entropy term diverges without bound:
Because the entropic singularity unconditionally overwhelms any finite enthalpy term at dilute limits, the free energy curve must plunge vertically downwards before curving back upwards into the demixing hump.