In modern surface engineering, microelectronics, and high-temperature protective coatings, thin metallic films are frequently deposited on metallic substrates to impart oxidation resistance, electrical conductivity, or wear resistance. When such bi-material assemblies are exposed to elevated temperatures, interdiffusion between the film and substrate alters the interfacial chemistry and physical integrity of the coating.
The copper–nickel ($\text{Cu–Ni}$) binary system provides a model configuration for investigating these processes. Both copper and nickel crystallise in the face-centred cubic ($\text{fcc}$) lattice and exhibit complete, isomorphous mutual solubility across the entire compositional spectrum at typical processing temperatures ($700\ ^\circ\text{C}$ to $1050\ ^\circ\text{C}$).
We consider a physical geometry consisting of a flat, continuous thin film of pure copper of uniform initial thickness $h$ deposited on the planar surface of a semi-infinite nickel substrate bar. Let the spatial coordinate $x$ be oriented normal to the outer planar surface of the film and directed inward into the substrate:
The initial concentration distribution of copper, expressed as an atomic (mole) fraction $C_{\text{Cu}}(x, 0)$, is described mathematically by a top-hat step profile:
\begin{equation} C_{\text{Cu}}(x, 0) = \begin{cases} 1, & 0 \le x \le h \\ 0, & x > h \end{cases} \label{eq:initial_cond} \end{equation}Correspondingly, by site-conservation in a binary substitutional solid solution, the nickel concentration satisfies $C_{\text{Ni}}(x, t) = 1 - C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t)$ everywhere.
Under isothermal conditions, one-dimensional atomic transport in the laboratory coordinate frame is governed by Fick's second law:
\begin{equation} \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left( \tilde{D} \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x} \right) \label{eq:fick2_general} \end{equation}where $\tilde{D}$ is the chemical interdiffusion coefficient of the $\text{Cu–Ni}$ alloy. While $\tilde{D}$ exhibits mild composition dependence across the binary range, analytical treatment of the finite-source problem proceeds under the standard linearisation approximation $\tilde{D} \approx \text{constant}$ evaluated at the mean interfacial composition:
\begin{equation} \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial t} = \tilde{D} \frac{\partial^2 C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x^2}, \quad \text{for } x \in (0, +\infty), \; t > 0 \label{eq:linear_diff} \end{equation}The physical constraints of the thin-film configuration impose two boundary conditions on the spatial domain $[0, +\infty)$:
To solve the initial-boundary value problem defined by equations \eqref{eq:initial_cond}, \eqref{eq:linear_diff}, \eqref{eq:bc_surface}, and \eqref{eq:bc_farfield}, we employ the method of images (the reflection principle).
Consider the one-dimensional diffusion equation on the unbounded real domain $x \in (-\infty, +\infty)$:
\begin{equation} \frac{\partial C}{\partial t} = \tilde{D} \frac{\partial^2 C}{\partial x^2} \end{equation}The fundamental solution (Green's function) corresponding to an instantaneous unit point source released at position $x = x'$ at $t = 0$ is the Gaussian kernel:
\begin{equation} G(x, x', t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4 \pi \tilde{D} t}} \exp\left( -\frac{(x - x')^2}{4 \tilde{D} t} \right) \end{equation}By linear superposition, the solution for any initial concentration distribution $C_0(x')$ on the infinite line is given by the convolution integral:
\begin{equation} C(x, t) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} C_0(x') G(x, x', t) \, dx' = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4 \pi \tilde{D} t}} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} C_0(x') \exp\left( -\frac{(x - x')^2}{4 \tilde{D} t} \right) dx' \label{eq:convolution} \end{equation}To satisfy the homogeneous Neumann condition $\left.\frac{\partial C}{\partial x}\right|_{x=0} = 0$ automatically for all $t > 0$, the concentration profile must remain an even function of $x$ across the origin ($C(-x, t) = C(x, t)$). Differentiating an even function with respect to $x$ yields an odd derivative, ensuring $\frac{\partial C}{\partial x}(0, t) = 0$.
We construct this symmetry by reflecting the initial copper slab of thickness $h$ across the $x = 0$ plane into the fictitious negative half-space $x \in [-h, 0]$. The resulting extended initial condition $C_{\text{ext}}(x, 0)$ on $x \in (-\infty, +\infty)$ is an even top-hat slab of total width $2h$ centred at the origin:
\begin{equation} C_{\text{ext}}(x, 0) = \begin{cases} 1, & -h \le x \le h \\ 0, & |x| > h \end{cases} \label{eq:extended_init} \end{equation}Substituting equation \eqref{eq:extended_init} into the convolution integral \eqref{eq:convolution}:
\begin{equation} C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4 \pi \tilde{D} t}} \int_{-h}^{+h} \exp\left( -\frac{(x - x')^2}{4 \tilde{D} t} \right) dx' \end{equation}We introduce the dimensionless change of variable:
\begin{equation} u \equiv \frac{x' - x}{2 \sqrt{\tilde{D} t}} \implies dx' = 2 \sqrt{\tilde{D} t} \, du \end{equation}The integration limits transform accordingly:
The integral transforms to:
\begin{equation} C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4 \pi \tilde{D} t}} \cdot 2 \sqrt{\tilde{D} t} \int_{- \frac{h+x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}}^{\frac{h-x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}} \exp(-u^2) \, du = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_{- \frac{h+x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}}^{\frac{h-x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}} \exp(-u^2) \, du \end{equation}Splitting the integral into two parts around $u = 0$:
\begin{equation} C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_0^{\frac{h-x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}} \exp(-u^2) \, du + \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_{-\frac{h+x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}}^0 \exp(-u^2) \, du \end{equation}Since $\exp(-u^2)$ is symmetric ($\exp(-(-u)^2) = \exp(-u^2)$), the second integral satisfies:
\begin{equation} \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_{-\frac{h+x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}}^0 \exp(-u^2) \, du = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_0^{\frac{h+x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}} \exp(-u^2) \, du \end{equation}Recalling the standard definition of the Gaussian error function:
\begin{equation} \operatorname{erf}(z) \equiv \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_0^z \exp(-\xi^2) \, d\xi \implies \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_0^z \exp(-\xi^2) \, d\xi = \frac{1}{2} \operatorname{erf}(z) \end{equation}We obtain the exact analytical closed-form solution for the copper concentration profile:
\begin{equation} \boxed{C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t) = \frac{1}{2}\left[ \operatorname{erf}\left( \frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D} t}} \right) + \operatorname{erf}\left( \frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D} t}} \right) \right]} \label{eq:thin_film_solution} \end{equation}Correspondingly, the complementary nickel concentration distribution is given by:
\begin{equation} \boxed{C_{\text{Ni}}(x, t) = 1 - C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t) = 1 - \frac{1}{2}\left[ \operatorname{erf}\left( \frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D} t}} \right) + \operatorname{erf}\left( \frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D} t}} \right) \right]} \label{eq:nickel_solution} \end{equation}Differentiating equation \eqref{eq:thin_film_solution} with respect to $x$ using Leibniz's rule:
\begin{equation} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \operatorname{erf}(u(x)) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \exp(-u(x)^2) \frac{du}{dx} \end{equation}Letting $z_1(x) \equiv \frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}$ and $z_2(x) \equiv \frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}$, we evaluate the spatial derivatives:
\begin{equation} \frac{dz_1}{dx} = -\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}, \quad \frac{dz_2}{dx} = +\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \end{equation}The spatial gradient of the copper concentration profile is therefore:
\begin{equation} \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x} = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D} t}} \left[ \exp\left( - z_2^2 \right) - \exp\left( - z_1^2 \right) \right] \label{eq:first_derivative} \end{equation}Evaluating this gradient at the free outer surface ($x = 0$):
\begin{equation} \left. z_1 \right|_{x=0} = \frac{h}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}, \quad \left. z_2 \right|_{x=0} = \frac{h}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \implies z_1 = z_2 \end{equation} \begin{equation} \left. \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x} \right|_{x=0} = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D} t}} \left[ \exp\left( -\frac{h^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \right) - \exp\left( -\frac{h^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \right) \right] \equiv 0 \end{equation}The zero-flux Neumann boundary condition is thus satisfied identically for all $t > 0$, guaranteeing zero atomic loss across the outer surface.
The total amount of copper in the physical half-space $x \in [0, +\infty)$ must equal the initial mass of the deposited film ($h$ per unit area):
\begin{equation} M_{\text{Cu}}(t) = \int_0^{+\infty} C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t) \, dx = \frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} C_{\text{ext}}(x, t) \, dx = \frac{1}{2} (2h) = h \end{equation}The mathematical model guarantees rigorous conservation of solute matter over all time.
When the characteristic diffusion penetration distance $2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}$ is small compared to the film thickness $h$, the diffusion front has not yet felt the presence of the free surface. Under this condition, for positions near the interface ($x \approx h$):
\begin{equation} \frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \gg 1 \implies \operatorname{erf}\left( \frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \right) \approx 1 \end{equation}Substituting this approximation into equation \eqref{eq:thin_film_solution}:
\begin{equation} C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t) \approx \frac{1}{2}\left[ \operatorname{erf}\left( \frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \right) + 1 \right] = \frac{1}{2} \operatorname{erfc}\left( \frac{x - h}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \right) \end{equation}This recovers precisely the classical complementary error function solution for a semi-infinite diffusion couple centred at $x = h$. In this regime, the surface concentration remains pinned at pure copper:
\begin{equation} C_{\text{Cu}}(0, t) = \operatorname{erf}\left( \frac{h}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \right) \approx 1.00 \end{equation}When annealing times are long such that $2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t} \gg h$, solute has spread deeply into the nickel substrate, and the finite reservoir of the film becomes exhausted. Using the Taylor expansion of the error function for small arguments ($\operatorname{erf}(z) \approx \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} z$ as $z \to 0$):
\begin{equation} \operatorname{erf}\left( \frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \right) + \operatorname{erf}\left( \frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \right) \approx \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\left( \frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} + \frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \right) \exp\left( -\frac{x^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \right) = \frac{2h}{\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D} t}} \exp\left( -\frac{x^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \right) \end{equation}The concentration profile converges to a decaying Gaussian distribution reflecting off the impermeable wall:
\begin{equation} \boxed{C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t) \approx \frac{h}{\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D} t}} \exp\left( -\frac{x^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \right)} \label{eq:gaussian_limit} \end{equation}In this regime, the copper concentration at the free surface decays algebraically as:
\begin{equation} C_{\text{Cu}}(0, t) \approx \frac{h}{\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D} t}} \propto t^{-1/2} \end{equation}The thin copper film is progressively dissolved and diluted into the bulk nickel bar.
In a binary substitutional metallic solution, atomic transport occurs predominantly via the vacancy exchange mechanism. Atoms of copper and nickel do not exchange positions symmetrically; instead, each species possesses its own characteristic jumping frequency and mobility.
The intrinsic diffusion coefficients of copper ($D_{\text{Cu}}$) and nickel ($D_{\text{Ni}}$) obey Arrhenius temperature dependencies:
\begin{equation} D_{\text{Cu}}(T) = D_{0, \text{Cu}} \exp\left( -\frac{Q_{\text{Cu}}}{R T} \right), \quad D_{\text{Ni}}(T) = D_{0, \text{Ni}} \exp\left( -\frac{Q_{\text{Ni}}}{R T} \right) \end{equation}The kinetic parameters for tracer and intrinsic diffusion in the $\text{fcc}$ $\text{Cu–Ni}$ system are established experimentally:
Because nickel has a substantially higher melting point ($T_{\text{m, Ni}} = 1455\ ^\circ\text{C} = 1728\text{ K}$) and greater cohesive bond strength than copper ($T_{\text{m, Cu}} = 1085\ ^\circ\text{C} = 1358\text{ K}$), the activation enthalpy for vacancy formation and migration in nickel is considerably higher ($Q_{\text{Ni}} - Q_{\text{Cu}} \approx 69\text{ kJ/mol}$). Consequently, across all operational annealing temperatures ($700\ ^\circ\text{C}\text{--}1050\ ^\circ\text{C}$):
\begin{equation} \frac{D_{\text{Cu}}}{D_{\text{Ni}}} \approx 4.0 \text{ to } 6.5 \end{equation}Copper atoms diffuse significantly faster than nickel atoms.
In the crystal lattice frame (denoted with a prime $'$), atomic fluxes are driven by local concentration gradients:
\begin{align} J_{\text{Cu}}' &= - D_{\text{Cu}} \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x'} \\ J_{\text{Ni}}' &= - D_{\text{Ni}} \frac{\partial C_{\text{Ni}}}{\partial x'} = + D_{\text{Ni}} \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x'} \end{align}Because $D_{\text{Cu}} > D_{\text{Ni}}$ and $\frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x'} < 0$ across the film–substrate interface, the outward intrinsic flux of copper leaving the film ($|J_{\text{Cu}}'|$) exceeds the inward intrinsic flux of nickel entering the film ($|J_{\text{Ni}}'|$). To prevent catastrophic local volumetric dilation and maintain constant atomic density, the crystal lattice planes must undergo a convective drift velocity $v$ relative to the laboratory frame:
\begin{equation} v = (D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}) \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x} \label{eq:darken_velocity} \end{equation}The total flux of copper in the fixed laboratory coordinate system is:
\begin{equation} J_{\text{Cu}} = J_{\text{Cu}}' + C_{\text{Cu}} v = - \tilde{D} \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x} \end{equation}where $\tilde{D}$ is Darken's interdiffusivity:
\begin{equation} \boxed{\tilde{D} = \left( C_{\text{Ni}} D_{\text{Cu}} + C_{\text{Cu}} D_{\text{Ni}} \right) \Phi} \label{eq:darken_interdiff} \end{equation}Here, $\Phi = 1 + \frac{\partial \ln \gamma_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial \ln C_{\text{Cu}}}$ is the thermodynamic factor representing non-ideality of mixing. In the $\text{Cu–Ni}$ solid solution, $\Phi \approx 1$ to a good approximation, yielding the weighted kinematic average $\tilde{D} = C_{\text{Ni}} D_{\text{Cu}} + C_{\text{Cu}} D_{\text{Ni}}$.
Consider insoluble, chemically inert markers (such as sub-micron tungsten particles or molybdenum wires) placed precisely at the film–substrate contact interface ($x = h$) during deposition at $t = 0$.
Because inert markers do not participate in substitutional lattice diffusion, they remain affixed to their local atomic plane. Their instantaneous velocity in the laboratory coordinate frame $v_{\text{K}}(t)$ matches the local Darken lattice drift velocity \eqref{eq:darken_velocity} evaluated at the marker plane position $x_{\text{K}}(t)$:
\begin{equation} v_{\text{K}}(t) = \frac{dx_{\text{K}}}{dt} = \left. (D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}) \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x} \right|_{x = x_{\text{K}}(t)} \label{eq:marker_vel_exact} \end{equation}Substituting the analytical spatial gradient \eqref{eq:first_derivative} into \eqref{eq:marker_vel_exact}:
\begin{equation} \frac{dx_{\text{K}}}{dt} = \frac{D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}}{2\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D} t}} \left[ \exp\left( -\frac{(h + x_{\text{K}})^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \right) - \exp\left( -\frac{(h - x_{\text{K}})^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \right) \right] \label{eq:marker_ode}Since the markers originate at $x_{\text{K}}(0) = h$, we evaluate the sign of the velocity for $x_{\text{K}} \approx h$:
\begin{equation} \frac{(h + x_{\text{K}})^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \approx \frac{4h^2}{4\tilde{D}t} = \frac{h^2}{\tilde{D}t} > 0, \quad \frac{(h - x_{\text{K}})^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \approx 0 \end{equation}Therefore:
\begin{equation} \exp\left( -\frac{(h + x_{\text{K}})^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \right) - \exp\left( -\frac{(h - x_{\text{K}})^2}{4\tilde{D}t} \right) \approx e^{-h^2/\tilde{D}t} - 1 < 0 \end{equation}Because $D_{\text{Cu}} > D_{\text{Ni}}$, this establishes that:
\begin{equation} \boxed{v_{\text{K}}(t) < 0 \implies x_{\text{K}}(t) < h} \end{equation}During the early and intermediate stages of interdiffusion ($t \le h^2 / (4\tilde{D})$), the term $\exp(-(h+x_{\text{K}})^2 / (4\tilde{D}t))$ is negligible, and equation \eqref{eq:marker_ode} simplifies to:
\begin{equation} \frac{dx_{\text{K}}}{dt} \approx - \frac{D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}}{2\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D}}} t^{-1/2} \end{equation}Integrating with the initial condition $x_{\text{K}}(0) = h$:
\begin{equation} x_{\text{K}}(t) = h - \frac{D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}}{\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D}}} \sqrt{t} \label{eq:marker_trajectory} \end{equation}The inward marker displacement relative to the initial film boundary $\Delta x_{\text{K}}(t) \equiv x_{\text{K}}(t) - h$ scales with the square root of time:
\begin{equation} \Delta x_{\text{K}}(t) = - \frac{D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}}{\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D}}} \sqrt{t} < 0 \end{equation}Classical Darken theory assumes that the crystal lattice maintains thermodynamic equilibrium vacancy concentrations everywhere ($C_{\text{v}} \equiv C_{\text{v}}^{\text{eq}}$) via infinitely fast vacancy creation and annihilation at dislocation climb jogs. However, in real crystalline thin films, dislocation densities are finite, leading to significant local departures from equilibrium.
Because substitutional diffusion is mediated entirely by vacancy exchanges, each forward atomic hop requires a reverse vacancy hop. Site conservation requires:
\begin{equation} J_{\text{v}}' + J_{\text{Cu}}' + J_{\text{Ni}}' = 0 \implies J_{\text{v}}' = - (J_{\text{Cu}}' + J_{\text{Ni}}') \end{equation}Substituting the intrinsic atomic fluxes:
\begin{equation} J_{\text{v}}' = -\left( - D_{\text{Cu}} \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x} - D_{\text{Ni}} \frac{\partial C_{\text{Ni}}}{\partial x} \right) = (D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}) \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x} \label{eq:vacancy_flux} \end{equation}Because $\frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x} < 0$ and $D_{\text{Cu}} > D_{\text{Ni}}$, $J_{\text{v}}' < 0$. Vacancies are pumped across the interface from the nickel substrate into the copper coating.
The local time rate of change of vacancy concentration $C_{\text{v}}(x, t)$ is governed by the one-dimensional continuity equation:
\begin{equation} \frac{\partial C_{\text{v}}}{\partial t} = - \frac{\partial J_{\text{v}}'}{\partial x} - \dot{\sigma}_{\text{sink}} \label{eq:vac_continuity} \end{equation}where $\dot{\sigma}_{\text{sink}}$ represents the net rate of vacancy destruction at dislocation climb jogs and grain boundaries. According to standard chemical relaxation kinetics, the sink term is proportional to the local excess vacancy concentration $\Delta C_{\text{v}} \equiv C_{\text{v}} - C_{\text{v}}^{\text{eq}}$:
\begin{equation} \dot{\sigma}_{\text{sink}} = \frac{C_{\text{v}} - C_{\text{v}}^{\text{eq}}}{\tau_{\text{v}}} \label{eq:sink_kinetics} \end{equation}where $\tau_{\text{v}}$ is the vacancy relaxation lifetime. In physical metallurgy, $\tau_{\text{v}}$ is determined by the mean dislocation density $\rho_{\text{d}}$ and vacancy diffusivity $D_{\text{v}}$:
\begin{equation} \tau_{\text{v}} \approx \frac{1}{\rho_{\text{d}} D_{\text{v}}} \end{equation}In well-annealed crystals with low dislocation density ($\rho_{\text{d}} \sim 10^{11}\text{ m}^{-2}$), $\tau_{\text{v}}$ is large, allowing excess vacancies to persist; in cold-worked or nanocrystalline films with dense dislocation networks ($\rho_{\text{d}} \sim 10^{15}\text{ m}^{-2}$), $\tau_{\text{v}}$ is small, forcing rapid relaxation toward equilibrium.
Because the vacancy migration energy ($E_{\text{m, v}} \approx 0.8\text{--}1.0\text{ eV}$) is far smaller than the total self-diffusion activation enthalpy ($Q \approx 2.2\text{--}2.9\text{ eV}$), vacancies redistribute much more rapidly than substitutional atoms. Over macroscopic interdiffusion time scales, the vacancy concentration field reaches a quasi-steady state ($\frac{\partial C_{\text{v}}}{\partial t} \approx 0$):
\begin{equation} - \frac{\partial J_{\text{v}}'}{\partial x} - \frac{C_{\text{v}} - C_{\text{v}}^{\text{eq}}}{\tau_{\text{v}}} \approx 0 \end{equation}Rearranging yields the excess vacancy concentration:
\begin{equation} \Delta C_{\text{v}}(x, t) = C_{\text{v}}(x, t) - C_{\text{v}}^{\text{eq}} = - \tau_{\text{v}} \frac{\partial J_{\text{v}}'}{\partial x} \end{equation}Substituting the vacancy flux expression \eqref{eq:vacancy_flux}:
\begin{equation} \boxed{\Delta C_{\text{v}}(x, t) = - \tau_{\text{v}} (D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}) \frac{\partial^2 C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x^2}} \label{eq:excess_vac_master} \end{equation}The non-equilibrium vacancy deviation is strictly proportional to the negative of the second spatial derivative (curvature) of the copper concentration profile.
To evaluate $\Delta C_{\text{v}}(x, t)$ explicitly, we differentiate the first derivative \eqref{eq:first_derivative} with respect to $x$:
\begin{equation} \frac{\partial^2 C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x^2} = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D} t}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left[ \exp\left( - z_2^2 \right) - \exp\left( - z_1^2 \right) \right] \end{equation}Recalling $z_1 = \frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}$ and $z_2 = \frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}$:
\begin{align} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \exp(-z_2^2) &= -2 z_2 \exp(-z_2^2) \frac{dz_2}{dx} = - \frac{z_2}{\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \exp(-z_2^2) \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(-\exp(-z_1^2)\right) &= 2 z_1 \exp(-z_1^2) \frac{dz_1}{dx} = - \frac{z_1}{\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}} \exp(-z_1^2) \end{align}Combining these expressions yields the exact analytical curvature of the thin-film profile:
\begin{equation} \boxed{\frac{\partial^2 C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x^2} = - \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi} (\tilde{D} t)} \left[ z_1 \exp(-z_1^2) + z_2 \exp(-z_2^2) \right]} \label{eq:second_derivative} \end{equation}Substituting \eqref{eq:second_derivative} into the master excess equation \eqref{eq:excess_vac_master}:
\begin{equation} \Delta C_{\text{v}}(x, t) = \frac{\tau_{\text{v}} (D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}})}{2\sqrt{\pi} (\tilde{D} t)} \left[ z_1 \exp(-z_1^2) + z_2 \exp(-z_2^2) \right] \end{equation}Normalising by the local thermal equilibrium concentration $C_{\text{v}}^{\text{eq}}$:
\begin{equation} \boxed{\frac{C_{\text{v}}(x, t)}{C_{\text{v}}^{\text{eq}}} = 1 + \frac{\tau_{\text{v}} (D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}})}{C_{\text{v}}^{\text{eq}} \cdot 2\sqrt{\pi} (\tilde{D} t)} \left[ \left(\frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}\right) \exp\left(-\left(\frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}\right)^2\right) + \left(\frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}\right) \exp\left(-\left(\frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}\right)^2\right) \right]} \label{eq:vac_ratio_thin} \end{equation}The behaviour of equation \eqref{eq:vac_ratio_thin} across the physical domain is governed by the dominant term $z_1 = \frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}$:
The chemical potential of excess vacancies in the supersaturated copper film is:
\begin{equation} \Delta \mu_{\text{v}} = k_{\text{B}} T \ln\left( \frac{C_{\text{v}}}{C_{\text{v}}^{\text{eq}}} \right) \end{equation}When the supersaturation ratio $\frac{C_{\text{v}}}{C_{\text{v}}^{\text{eq}}}$ exceeds a critical barrier (typically $1.02\text{--}1.10$ in $\text{fcc}$ metals with low jog densities), excess vacancies undergo homogeneous or heterogeneous condensation into three-dimensional pores: Kirkendall voids (also termed Frenkel voids).
The physical parameters, material constants, and mathematical equations governing interdiffusion and vacancy kinetics in the thin-film copper–nickel couple are compiled below:
| Parameter / property | Symbol | Value / mathematical expression | Provenance / description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copper pre-exponential factor | $D_{0, \text{Cu}}$ | $7.8 \times 10^{-5}\text{ m}^2/\text{s}$ | Experimental tracer diffusion in $\text{Cu–Ni}$ alloys |
| Copper activation enthalpy | $Q_{\text{Cu}}$ | $211.0\text{ kJ/mol}$ ($2.19\text{ eV}$) | Lower cohesive energy ($T_{\text{m}} = 1085\ ^\circ\text{C}$) |
| Nickel pre-exponential factor | $D_{0, \text{Ni}}$ | $1.9 \times 10^{-4}\text{ m}^2/\text{s}$ | Experimental tracer diffusion in $\text{Cu–Ni}$ alloys |
| Nickel activation enthalpy | $Q_{\text{Ni}}$ | $280.0\text{ kJ/mol}$ ($2.90\text{ eV}$) | Higher cohesive energy ($T_{\text{m}} = 1455\ ^\circ\text{C}$) |
| Universal gas constant | $R$ | $8.31446\text{ J/(mol K)}$ | Fundamental thermodynamic constant |
| Interdiffusion coefficient | $\tilde{D}$ | $0.5(D_{\text{Cu}} + D_{\text{Ni}})$ | Darken weighted average at equiatomic interface |
| Copper concentration profile | $C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t)$ | $\frac{1}{2}\left[\operatorname{erf}\left(\frac{h - x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}\right) + \operatorname{erf}\left(\frac{h + x}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}\right)\right]$ | Exact analytical solution via method of images |
| Nickel concentration profile | $C_{\text{Ni}}(x, t)$ | $1 - C_{\text{Cu}}(x, t)$ | Substitutional binary site conservation |
| Surface concentration | $C_{\text{Cu}}(0, t)$ | $\operatorname{erf}\left(\frac{h}{2\sqrt{\tilde{D}t}}\right)$ | Dissolution dynamics at free impermeable surface |
| Kirkendall marker velocity | $v_{\text{K}}(t)$ | $\left.(D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}) \frac{\partial C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x}\right|_{x_{\text{K}}}$ | Convective drift of lattice planes into copper film |
| Early marker displacement | $\Delta x_{\text{K}}(t)$ | $- \frac{D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}}{\sqrt{\pi \tilde{D}}} \sqrt{t}$ | Inward migration from $x = h$ toward $x = 0$ |
| Vacancy continuity balance | $\Delta C_{\text{v}}(x, t)$ | $- \tau_{\text{v}} (D_{\text{Cu}} - D_{\text{Ni}}) \frac{\partial^2 C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x^2}$ | Quasi-steady-state dislocation relaxation balance |
| Vacancy profile curvature | $\frac{\partial^2 C_{\text{Cu}}}{\partial x^2}$ | $- \frac{z_1 e^{-z_1^2} + z_2 e^{-z_2^2}}{2\sqrt{\pi} \tilde{D} t}$ | Governs supersaturation ($x < h$) and subsaturation ($x > h$) |